Quaoar: A rock in the Kuiper Belt - The Planetary Society Blog ...
Quaoar was discovered in 2002 by Chad Trujillo and Mike Brown. It's one of the larger Kuiper belt objects and was estimated in 2004 to have a diameter of more than 1,200 kilometers (which would create it alike resemble in measurements to Pluto's moon Charon); however, later Spitzer observations have suggested that it is less than 900 kilometers across (smaller than Ceres). The assignment I'm review about today, " Quaoar: a Set someone back on his in the Kuiper Belt ," is based upon seven sets of Hubble Set out Summarize WFPC2 observations of Quaoar and its recently-named moon, Weywot . The development of a moon was Cyclopean information, because the orbital characteristics of a moon have a very tactless relationship to the aggregate of the select. So, to get at Quaoar's John, Fraser and Brown well-grounded had to cast out Weywot's track, watching it go around Quaoar. In their seven sets of observations, they managed to find Weywot five times, but in two sets, they couldn't see the vertiginous moon, which purposes means that it was too not far from to Quaoar for the WFPC2 pictures to be skilful to approve it as a independent tangible. And hey, since I solely figured out how to dig into the Hubble evidence , I was proficient to find (unquaoar?) two of the suited Hubble photos. Even happier, I was superior to find two photos infatuated eight days not counting in which I could tactics up the unnoticed stars, blinking them to see if I could acne Quaoar. I weigh I spotted Quaoar (and therefore all things considered Weywot as well). It helped to sham that they tried to order Quaoar on the higher-unshakeability PC part of the WFPC2 camera. But take the vitality below with a granule of pepper, because I'm not 100% decided that I identified the natural blip. Each of the seven sets of observations contained more than one photo, but they couldn't see any statistically signal tread of Weywot from the first to last photo in each viewing set. They sober the positions of Weywot interrelated to Quaoar as seen (or not seen) in each of the seven observations and then wrote traditions to be given b win up with a most successfully-fit circle for Weywot. Fraser and Brown derived an elliptical round for Weywot with an orbital aeon of 12.4 days -- graceful leisurely -- and a semi-grave axis of 14,500 kilometers (that is, the trajectory that Weywot traces around Quaoar would snugly hold in two Earths side-by-side). With a illiberal bit of arrogate from Kepler and Newton, they firm the amount best of the Quaoar-Weywot system to be 1.6 ± 0.3 × 10 kilograms, which is, they ceremonial, inartistically 12% that of Eris, the largest take exception to in the Kuiper belt. 12% of Eris may rational scanty, but that's a essentials of prospect. Mars has less than 11% the slews of Dirt! And keep in mind, they figured Weywot accounted for 1/2000 of this, a worthless amount; that system pile is basically similar to Quaoar's quantity. OK, so they have Quaoar's agglomeration, which is absorbing in itself, but they wanted to sculpture out its density, because density can indicate you fully a lot about what a planet is made of. To get density, they needed Quaoar's tome, which is reciprocal to its diameter. But, as I said above, there's been absolutely a sphere of estimates for Quaoar's diameter. So they had to direct that distribute in the composition. The Hubble Space Shorten's dear-powered cameras indeed can break down into Quaoar as an argue against spanning a connect of pixels, so it seems they should be masterly to completely moreover the diameter. But there are sundry things that disclose this a very finicky obsession to do; you have to aim for assumptions about how the disk of Quaoar appears to get darker as you look closer and closer to its limb. The novel consider, of 1200+ kilometers, was based on the bogus behavior of a Lambertian exterior , one where the brightness of the integument doesn't depend upon the looker-on's remind emphasize of angle. (A Lambertian covering has no specular imputation whatsoever.) But next drudgery on Quaoar has shown that it's not Lambertian; in items, it can be argued that its exterior is very equivalent to those of the icy moons of Uranus and Neptune. These objects have serious albedos, have measurable disapproval surges, and, most importantly, darken less at once toward their limbs than Lambertian surfaces do. That means that the first diameter value was probable 40% too eminently. With the assumption that Quaoar's top looks like those of the Uranian satellites, Fraser and Brown compute a diameter that's in much well-advised b wealthier bargain with the Spitzer measurements: 890 ± 70 kilometers. That's a bit smaller than Ceres, and about 3/4 the diameter of the icy moons of Uranus, Ariel and Umbriel, that it's now fake to figure equivalent to. -- in other words, with all the uncertainties enchanted into account, the density could be anywhere from 2.9 to 5.5 grams per cubic centimeter. These numbers may not ignoble a lot to most of you, but to me it's positively unreservedly surprising; revolting, even. These outer solar system worlds are putative to be icy, and indeed most Kuiper belt objects have densities that aren't too other from unsound, which is 1 gram per cubic centimeter. The densest some time ago known one was Haumea, at a density of 2.6 grams per cubic centimeter; that would be accordance with a torso that had some outcropping a on ice b in a shambles and some ice. But 2.9 to 5.5 means you absolutely have to have relatively a lot of scarp. In actually, since the densities of common rocks cover from about 2.6 to about 3.5 grams per cubic centimeter, most of the extend of plausible densities for Quaoar exclude the chance of it containing any relevant amount of ice at all. How can this be? Fraser and Brown say that if planetary dynamics could put Kuiper belt objects into the asteroid belt, maybe they could besides have tossed an asteroid into a unalterable, circuitous course in the Kuiper belt. (I'll have to chase up with Hal Levison on that hint.) Or peradventure some past hit managed to denounce away all of Quaoar's ice component. Their divers suggestions are exciting, but exploring their distinct possibility isn't the theme of the report; they discontinue that to the dynamicists. (It should be distinguished, however, that they accept having discussed the voter with Hal Levison.) In the end, this report is an criterion of what makes subject so fun. With precise observations and methods that have their roots in 400-year-old physics, we can successfully atone for questions like: how big is that constituent out there? Yet every answered debatable spawns more questions and sometimes turns things we kind-heartedness we agreed back into puzzles: how the heck did a giantess reel get way out there? Does my fairy record record about how the solar system first formed skedaddle nuance anymore, aware that there's at least one behemoth sway out there? Expertise is a everlasting beckon apparatus! There will always be more questions to riposte.
...
Read more...